Thursday, December 17, 2009

Government

So yesterday we had a visit of a Department of Ecology official. We are in the Samish watershed, and there is a push to decrease the contamination of this watershed because of periodic closures of Samish Bay shellfish harvests and increased coliform levels in its rivers and streams. It is all spelled out in the http://www.ecy.wa.gov/pubs/0910019.pdf


Samish Bay Watershed
Fecal Coliform Bacteria
Total Maximum Daily Load
Volume 2- TDML and Water Quality Implementation Plan
August 2009
Publication No. 90-10-019

So I read this 150 page document, and we are seemingly in compliance with all the recommendations that are in there. We have our animals fenced away from any streams, and we have gutters on our barn to collect rain water. We do not have stored manure piles. We are (what I though) was the kind of people that Skagit County would like to support. We came into this very dilapidated property and put a lot of hard work and money to fix it up. We are involved with agriculture which is what Skagit County is supposedly trying to support. We pay our taxes and stay out of trouble. So I was hoping that this visit would go well.

Naturally it did not. He waltzed in here and tells us all these government officials that can help us with developing our farm plan, help with pasture management, and improve weight gain in our animals. He told us about grant money available to comply with regulations for fencing, pipes, and engineered designs. Then he said we had to fence off our animals 35 feet from the ditch line on the road. He said we could use electric fencing, and it could be down during the grazing season but would need to be up by August 15th. August 15th!!! That is the driest day of the year. And electric net fencing is not safe in my opinion for horned animals. I lost my first Shetland ram Loki to an electric net fence. He then pointed out that we had dug a trench in one of our 7 fields which drained into the ditch from a pasture where animals are (three small sheep). But we said we could fill in this trench and keep the animals out of this pasture once breeding season is over next week.
At his point I pointed to what I think is our real water pollution issue- the drainage from the development behind our property that floods our fields when there are heavy downpours. We believe this drainage through a culvert onto our property to be illegal because we have the original survey showing no culvert, the ditches designed for the drainage, and that all drainage from the development must be contained in them. There is not a drainage easement for our property, and this is not a natural waterway but a man-made one. We have tried to talk to the homeowners association, but the president does not return our calls. We have even talked to a land-use attorney about this. Well, this Department of Ecology official said he cannot regulate "clean" water drainage, but he does have authority over erosion. The culvert goes out from the road above our place at least 10 feet and free falls down onto our land causing a lot of erosion. The bottom of this culvert is also rotted out so some of the water runs under the culvert undermining it and the road. So this government official started talking about putting a wall on our property to control the erosion! Not the solution I was looking for.

The culvert on our property with water running through it
The "clean" water running out of the culvert

So I do not want a farm plan, I do not want government officials on our land, and I do not want their money. I also do not want to pollute Samish Bay, nor do I want to break the law. So we will put up the electric fencing (although I may not turn it on), fill in our trench and move our rams to the back far field (where it is a lot harder to care for and protect them). And I really hope this is adequate. Because if this official states that we have to put in 50 foot buffers all around our property we are done for. And that will be the end of Schoonover Farm. (and why I am up at 3 AM).

6 comments:

  1. Donna, I hope this ends well for you. Scary about the blog deletion! I rather count on mine as a photo album, journal and information log!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Eeeks. on both counts. Sorry to hear about your dept of ecology problem. I really hope that common sense will prevail and they will leave you alone!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Saw your post on Michelle's blog.

    Did you have mailware? Do you know how you might have got it?

    Sorry to ready about your 'offical' problem

    ReplyDelete
  4. Boy, Donna...
    First, I'm sorry about the blog-business. I don't have mailware (at least that I know of). But why would they delete you?

    Re: the land. If I were you I would start documenting EVERYTHING and get a hold of a couple of folks:
    -a lawyer
    -the newspaper! Heck, send emails to all the network news programs on tv outlining how you're being pushed around by all these folks.
    -Your congressman and senator(s). Let them know how this is snowballing and what's been going on. It's the squeeky wheel that gets the grease, so go for it.
    I hate to say it, but I think you're in for a fight ahead. :(

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hi Donna,
    I'm sorry. The culvert from the neighbors looks sue-able to me; have you called your county, (presuming they have a land use/zoning/planning office) to see if it was approved to begin with? The conservation people-- well, all agencies are different, but I got great help from my Soil & Water Conservation District (SWCD), as well as a few thousand dollars' assistance with fencing (a small percentage). I realize many folks don't want to deal with gov't, though. SWCD had a state rotational grazing expert (MN) who keeps sheep, though. He was on my side, and I was on the side of the environment, too, so it was a good alliance. Best wishes on all of it--

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks for all of your comments. I am still in the information gathering and documenting phased of dealing with our water situation.

    I am still waiting for blogger to get back to me. See my next post. It does not appear that it is a Malware problem but a "spam blog" problem. I make suggestions in my next post about how all you good bloggers out there may want to protect yourselves and your lovely blogs.

    ReplyDelete